SpacePilot PRO (overreaching?)

There’s a Simpsons‘ episode where Homer discovers he has a successful half-brother named Herb Powell.  Herb runs a car company.  Herb is convinced that Homer represents the average American and is therefore the perfect person to design a new car for his company.  Herb introduces Homer to his company’s design team.  The design team ignore Home and instead use their experience to design perfect vehicle.

Homer is at first intimidated by the design team, but Herb feels that Homer is not being forceful enough with his ideas.  Herb invigorates Homer.  Homer then rejects the designers’ ideas and instead implements strange ideas like dual bubble domes, fins and several horns that play “La Cucaracha”.  At the unveiling of new car, dubbed “The Homer”, Herb is horrified to discover that the car is a monstrosity that costs $82,000.  Herb’s company goes under and he becomes broke.

What’s the lesson here?  Have a focus when designing the next hot gadget.  The design of the 3DConnexion SpacePilot PRO isn’t like “The Homer” in that it is sleek and functional.  However, there does not seem to be a strong focus for the device.  Is it a 3D mouse, or an Outlook companion, or a keyboard replacement, or an RSS feed reader?  Right now, it is all of these things.

First, why does a control device have an LCD screen?  If there was a need for me to see a status of something, then I can see why some sort of visual feedback would be necessary.  There isn’t much of a need for that with this device, however.  (Please see P.P.P.S below for notice of an update to this criticism.)

Second, on that LCD, I’m given the ability to open Outlook email, appointments and tasks.  Given the fact that I have two monitors, this functionality is not needed for me.  I keep Outlook open and in view on my second monitor all day anyway.

Third, why does this device give me RSS feeds?  In my mind, the goal of a control device should be to not require the user to look at it while it is being used.  That LCD screen bags to be looked at.  Sometimes I feel bad that I’m not using it.

My criticism of the LCD is based solely on the fact that I have two monitors.  For someone with a single monitor, I can see why this functionality would be useful and a real time saver.

I think that a future device that 3DConnexion should develop is a more compact version of the SpacePilot PRO without an LCD screen.  Then bring in all the buttons closer to the control knob and place them under the most likely locations where one’s fingers will naturally land.  Make sure all of the buttons are multi-function programmable (just like the SpacePilot PRO).

My bottom line, this device is worth the $499 price tag if there happens to be a need for an LCD screen with the ability to launch Outlook tools and read RSS feeds.  I’m sure this device will save someone time and money (such as users with only one monitor).  However, if I were to spend my own money, I would want a simpler device that is geared towards controlling my views within the model and shortcuting tasking within the 3D CAD environment.  The SpacePilot PRO is a strong step in that direction, but it overreaches in other areas where there doesn’t seem to be much of a need (at least for me).  When I am in the market to buy another 3D mouse, I would be interested in the hypothetical SpaceExplorer PRO with a more compact design, more multi-function programmable buttons, and better placement for the buttons.  My price range would be in the area of $300, though 3DConnexion might hafta bring the price down to $199 (twice the price of high-end standard mice) to help sales take off.

I don’t represent the average American, nor do I feel I am the average 3D CAD user.  I like my SpacePilot PRO, and will likely continue to use it.  However, I can see where this might be a case of less is more.  I’ve looked at the current generation of the SpaceExplorer and I actually think that it would be more ideal for one’s home office.

—-

P.S., why hasn’t the 3DConnexion control knob not been turned into a gaming controller yet?  This seems like an obvious application for 3D mice.  Speaking of other applications, this might not be a bad idea as a control mechanism for a navigation and center console control system in a car.

P.P.S., this device works awesomely in the main mode of Google Earth (though it would be nice for it to work in all modes withing Google Earth).  They should really make a driver for Celestia.

P.P.P.S., I originally wrote this article before the recent update to the drivers for the SpacePilot PRO.  With the recent update, my opinion about the LCD has changed a little bit.  I’ll address this in a future article.

May Contest becomes a battle

May Contest has grown into a bit of a battle between Deepak Gupta and Frank Dijkstra. I must say the response is a bit more than I expected.  There are certainly a lot of SolidWorks related online forums.  The winner is a long way from being determined.  Even with all of their combined contributions (many of which has surprized me), I can comfortably say there are forums they haven’t found yet.  Who will come out on top?  Sitting on the sidelines is Matt West who has shown interest in submitting many of his own links.  I have to wonder if the uniqueness his list has been diminished as a result of Deepak’s and Frank’s efforts.  I guess we’ll soon see.

May 2009 SW Legion Contest: Find New Forums

Announcing the May 2009 SolidWorks Legion Contest.  This month’s contest is a scavenger hunt.  Your mission, should you chose to accept it, is to find SolidWorks related forums (such as http://forum.solidworks.com or http://www.eng-tips.com) that are not currently linked on my resources site here.  To enter the contest, simply comment on this message with the link of the new site(s) you’ve found.  The person with the most new sites will win.  For repeated sites, the first person to submit the link will get credit for it.  Also, if need be, we’ll do a rock-paper-scissors via email as a tie breaker.  The outcome of this contest is at my sole discretion, but I promise to act fairly.  🙂  This contest will conclude on June 1, 2009.

Up for grabs is a CSWP test of your choice.  If you already have your CSWP, then try for one of the specialty certifications, such as modelling or sheet metal.  Best of luck to all!

SpacePilot PRO (My experience so far)

I’ve seen someone say that either you hate 3DConnexion 3D mice or you love ’em. Now that I’ve been using the SpacePilot PRO for a little while, I can honestly say I don’t see that. Personally, I like my device, but I could live without it. Since I only have one, I kinda do have to live without it at home anyway. With a capable mouse, one can maneuver a model in SolidWorks just fine.
SpacePilot PROThe advantage of the 3D mouse is that you can maneuver the model and continue to work on the model at the same time. So, the 3D mouse does help me work faster. I like things that allow me to work faster.

It did take me more than a week to get use to how it functions and to find the settings that work best in my environment. Finding the right sensitivity is paramount to using the SpacePilot PRO.

Adjusting the sensitivity is accomplished in two ways.  When adjusting it, make sure the affected application is open (i.e., SolidWorks). Overall sensitivity is controlled by a togglish button. On one side is a minus symbol. On the other is a plus symbol. Pressing either will yield results that are immediately appreciable when moving the control knob. If one wishes to change relative sensitivity of specific controls there is a program included called 3Dconnexion Control Panel. This has several tabs that get in to the functionality of the SpacePilot PRO. Relative speed control is on the Advanced Settings tab. Pan right/left, Pan up/down, zoom, tilt, spin and roll can all be set to their own specific relative sensitivity (which 3DConnexion calls “Speed”).  I like mine set up like this.

SpacePilot PRO Speed Settings

Once I set sensitivity to a comfortable level, this device has proven itself to be a useful tool that has made my work easier.

Create the Future Design Contest

Create the Future Design Contest is an annual contest from NASA Tech Briefs and Dassault Systemes SolidWorks Corp.  Sigh.  Why is SolidWorks Corp still saddled with that crazy name that in no way represents it.  Anyway, this contest recognizes product design innovation in several categories.  This year’s winners represent quite an impressive collection of inventions.  The grand prize this year was certainly deserving.

LifeBelt CPRThe grand prize is the LifeBelt CPR of Deca-Medics, Inc.  It is a compact and lightweight device designed to be attached quickly to someone who is having a Sudden Cardiac Arrest.  It enables a rescuer to start CPR about 15 seconds or less.  It is even equipped with an intuitive readout that helps the rescuer determine correct CPR compression.

I recently saw a news story that stated that average person doesn’t have enough expertise or stamina to conduct CPR long enough to be effective.  It was stated that most people tire out after two minutes, and that CPR could require up to 8 minutes of constant compressions.  Unfortunately, not long after I found that report, a sad incident occurred locally.  Recently the San Francisco Bay Area, a school nurse died of exhaustion minutes after conducting CPR on a coach who mysteriously collapsed. A device like the LifeBelt CPR would prevent this kind of ironic sad news.