SpacePilot PRO (overreaching?)

There’s a Simpsons‘ episode where Homer discovers he has a successful half-brother named Herb Powell.  Herb runs a car company.  Herb is convinced that Homer represents the average American and is therefore the perfect person to design a new car for his company.  Herb introduces Homer to his company’s design team.  The design team ignore Home and instead use their experience to design perfect vehicle.

Homer is at first intimidated by the design team, but Herb feels that Homer is not being forceful enough with his ideas.  Herb invigorates Homer.  Homer then rejects the designers’ ideas and instead implements strange ideas like dual bubble domes, fins and several horns that play “La Cucaracha”.  At the unveiling of new car, dubbed “The Homer”, Herb is horrified to discover that the car is a monstrosity that costs $82,000.  Herb’s company goes under and he becomes broke.

What’s the lesson here?  Have a focus when designing the next hot gadget.  The design of the 3DConnexion SpacePilot PRO isn’t like “The Homer” in that it is sleek and functional.  However, there does not seem to be a strong focus for the device.  Is it a 3D mouse, or an Outlook companion, or a keyboard replacement, or an RSS feed reader?  Right now, it is all of these things.

First, why does a control device have an LCD screen?  If there was a need for me to see a status of something, then I can see why some sort of visual feedback would be necessary.  There isn’t much of a need for that with this device, however.  (Please see P.P.P.S below for notice of an update to this criticism.)

Second, on that LCD, I’m given the ability to open Outlook email, appointments and tasks.  Given the fact that I have two monitors, this functionality is not needed for me.  I keep Outlook open and in view on my second monitor all day anyway.

Third, why does this device give me RSS feeds?  In my mind, the goal of a control device should be to not require the user to look at it while it is being used.  That LCD screen bags to be looked at.  Sometimes I feel bad that I’m not using it.

My criticism of the LCD is based solely on the fact that I have two monitors.  For someone with a single monitor, I can see why this functionality would be useful and a real time saver.

I think that a future device that 3DConnexion should develop is a more compact version of the SpacePilot PRO without an LCD screen.  Then bring in all the buttons closer to the control knob and place them under the most likely locations where one’s fingers will naturally land.  Make sure all of the buttons are multi-function programmable (just like the SpacePilot PRO).

My bottom line, this device is worth the $499 price tag if there happens to be a need for an LCD screen with the ability to launch Outlook tools and read RSS feeds.  I’m sure this device will save someone time and money (such as users with only one monitor).  However, if I were to spend my own money, I would want a simpler device that is geared towards controlling my views within the model and shortcuting tasking within the 3D CAD environment.  The SpacePilot PRO is a strong step in that direction, but it overreaches in other areas where there doesn’t seem to be much of a need (at least for me).  When I am in the market to buy another 3D mouse, I would be interested in the hypothetical SpaceExplorer PRO with a more compact design, more multi-function programmable buttons, and better placement for the buttons.  My price range would be in the area of $300, though 3DConnexion might hafta bring the price down to $199 (twice the price of high-end standard mice) to help sales take off.

I don’t represent the average American, nor do I feel I am the average 3D CAD user.  I like my SpacePilot PRO, and will likely continue to use it.  However, I can see where this might be a case of less is more.  I’ve looked at the current generation of the SpaceExplorer and I actually think that it would be more ideal for one’s home office.

—-

P.S., why hasn’t the 3DConnexion control knob not been turned into a gaming controller yet?  This seems like an obvious application for 3D mice.  Speaking of other applications, this might not be a bad idea as a control mechanism for a navigation and center console control system in a car.

P.P.S., this device works awesomely in the main mode of Google Earth (though it would be nice for it to work in all modes withing Google Earth).  They should really make a driver for Celestia.

P.P.P.S., I originally wrote this article before the recent update to the drivers for the SpacePilot PRO.  With the recent update, my opinion about the LCD has changed a little bit.  I’ll address this in a future article.

SpacePilot PRO (My experience so far)

I’ve seen someone say that either you hate 3DConnexion 3D mice or you love ’em. Now that I’ve been using the SpacePilot PRO for a little while, I can honestly say I don’t see that. Personally, I like my device, but I could live without it. Since I only have one, I kinda do have to live without it at home anyway. With a capable mouse, one can maneuver a model in SolidWorks just fine.
SpacePilot PROThe advantage of the 3D mouse is that you can maneuver the model and continue to work on the model at the same time. So, the 3D mouse does help me work faster. I like things that allow me to work faster.

It did take me more than a week to get use to how it functions and to find the settings that work best in my environment. Finding the right sensitivity is paramount to using the SpacePilot PRO.

Adjusting the sensitivity is accomplished in two ways.  When adjusting it, make sure the affected application is open (i.e., SolidWorks). Overall sensitivity is controlled by a togglish button. On one side is a minus symbol. On the other is a plus symbol. Pressing either will yield results that are immediately appreciable when moving the control knob. If one wishes to change relative sensitivity of specific controls there is a program included called 3Dconnexion Control Panel. This has several tabs that get in to the functionality of the SpacePilot PRO. Relative speed control is on the Advanced Settings tab. Pan right/left, Pan up/down, zoom, tilt, spin and roll can all be set to their own specific relative sensitivity (which 3DConnexion calls “Speed”).  I like mine set up like this.

SpacePilot PRO Speed Settings

Once I set sensitivity to a comfortable level, this device has proven itself to be a useful tool that has made my work easier.

SpacePilot PRO (Smudge Factor 10)

The SpacePilot PRO is a clean looking device right out of the box, with its swoopy shape and classy mix of matte black, patent black and dark grey colors. It even feels comfortable when I rest my palm on it and place my fingers around its control knob.

SpacePilot PRO

Size and placement

SpacePilot PRO is larger that one might expect for a control device. Its size is almost sprawling as it takes up a considerable portion of any desktop. I had difficulty in trying to find a location for my SpacePilot PRO. 3DConnexion recommends that their 3D mice be placed on the left of one’s keyboard and operated with the left hand. In the literature, it shows a mouse, keyboard and the SpacePilot PRO placed comfortably on a desktop. Unfortunately for us ergonomically educated individuals, this is not practical. I use an adjustable keyboard shelf. On most keyboard shelves, there’s room for the keyboard and the mouse (usually). So, where am I supposed to place my 3D mice?  Well, I like the device enough to consider a modification to my keyboard shelf.

Look and feel

When taken right out of the box, the pristine device is handsome.  It looks like it is meant to be used.  It doesn’t take long to realize that usage (particularly of the upper patent black region around the LCD screen) quickly envelopes the device with smudges.  On a scale of 1 to 5, I give the SpacePilot PRO a Smudge Factor of 10.  Touching the shiny surface (heck, maybe just breathing on it) will leave a smudge that quickly gives the SpacePilot PRO a worn-in look.

There are a lot of buttons on this device.  They are kinda spread out.  The device could take up slightly less desktop space if the buttons are brought in closer to the knob.  This would allow them to be more readily accessed by one’s fingers.  As for the number of programmable buttons, the device seems appropriately equipped.

One may find that sometimes the left hand will shift a bit while using the control knob.  The are guidelines on the side of the knob, but these are not easily felt.  Strangely, the most obvious location for guiding features would’ve been on the top of the knob, or around the knob’s top ledge, but none are there.

Do not take my criticisms as a reason dislike the device.  These are minor details that should to be a addressed by 3DConnexion in future versions of this device.  They are not show stoppers.  It is great to have a control device with programmable buttons.  I actually like the SpacePilot PRO for the programmable buttons as much as the 3D flexibility granted by the control knob.

3DConnexion SpacePilot PRO (Tinkering with buttons and views)

I’ve been tinkering with the SpacePilot PRO.  I love customization.  The SpacePilot PRO offers a high level of customization.  I will discuss different facets of the device in future articles.  This time I am writing about the programmable buttons.

SpacePilot PROThe SpacePilot PRO has 21 programmable buttons.  Additionally, 10 of those buttons have dual mappings for a total of 31 mapped commands.  That is a lot!  On top of that, each of the buttons are mapped differently for each program or mode supported by the device.  Within SolidWorks itself, there are three different mappings: Drawing, Part and Assembly modes.  (There is no mapping just for sketches, but there should be.)

Many of the buttons are directly related to functionality of the device or specific commands that are defined by intuitive icons.  Ultimately, I only recommend changing the mapping for the five buttons.  These are the dual mapped buttons labelled 1/6, 2/7, 3/8, 4/9, and 5/10.  When holding the left hand over the navigation knob, these buttons fall under the pinky finger. Giving the dual mapped button a single quick press initiates the first command.  To choose the second command instead, press and hold the button down for a second.  These buttons are a little awkward at first (being under the pinky), but I got used to it pretty quickly.

The 5 dual mapped buttons to the right of the knob (accessed with the thumb or index finger) provide quick access to standard model views.  For example, one button jumps to the front or back views of the model.  Most of the standard model views are covered by this set of buttons.  However, one thing that is missing is the ability to save a named view and to return to it at any time.  Given the level of detail that has gone into the SpacePilot PRO, it surprizes me that this ability is missing.  I think this is one of the points I mentioned to 3Dconnexion back in February.

So, you know what I did?  I made up for this missing functionality by writing a pair of macros that do just that.  One saves the current model view as a named view.  The other returns to that named view.  I then programmed these two functions to button 1/6.  (I’ve already uploaded these to my resources site here: Quick View Save and Restore.  These macros can actually be used with any device with programmable functions, or even just as icons on a toolbar.) Let’s hope that 3Dconnexion covers this basic function in future iterations of their 3D mice.

Hint: for users of SolidWorks 2008 and 2009, I would recommend programming one of the buttons to the letter “S” for the shortcut toolbar.  This would practically eliminate the need to touch the keyboard except for typing notes and numbers.

Overall, I have found that the plentiful number of buttons is a big plus for the SpacePilot PRO.  These buttons extend the functionality of the device beyond just being a 3D mouse.

3Dconnexion’s new SpacePilot PRO 3D Mouse

Before this month, I’ve never owned any 3Dconnexion 3D-mice in my life.  Heck, I wasn’t even exactly sure how to pronounce 3Dconnexion.  That “x” in the middle of the name throws me off.  Despite this, I’ve had some interest in their devices.  This has never taken me to the point of testing one on my own.  After all, I feel I’m pretty fast with my mouse-work and keyboard shortcuts.  So, when 3DConnexion asked to meet with me at SolidWorks World 2009, I was interested in seeing what they wanted to show me, yet skeptical about finding any game changers.

SpacePilot PROThey introduced me to the SpacePilot PRO 3D mouse.  (It may already be available on Amazon or other locations if someone is interested in looking for price comparisons.)  The SpacePilot PRO is the latest 3D mouse in a long line of professional 3D-mice which “have rewritten the rules on the way design engineers and professionals interact with 3D environments,” as noted by Dieter Neujahr in the official press release.  OK, so what am I doing quoting press release comments?

Now, anyone that reads my product reviews knows I’m no sell-out.  I don’t give shiny reviews to get free stuff.  I don’t run promotions.  For full disclosure, I must say that 3Dconnexion did give me a free SpacePilot PRO a few days ago.  This was given to me without any strings attached.  Technically, they didn’t even ask me to write any review or comment on the unit they give to me.  I made it clear back in February that if I did review the product based on the unit they were going to give me, it was going to be unbiased.  They seemed to insist upon that.  Even at that time, I had a few critical comments about the device (which I cannot remember now), to which they were receptive.

Does getting a free $499 device impact my opinion?  You betcha….JUST KIDDING!!  However, I do feel it is appropriate for me to write about my experiences, to give others a sense as to whether these devices are worth the cash.  Expect my usual sarcastic comments juxtaposed with well deserved praise, and demands for further improvement.

I’m not going to write one all encompassing review.  This is a highly capable device.  I doubt I can write completely about my experiences with this unit in one review without the article getting excessive in length.  I mean, just look how long this article is already, and I haven’t even started my review yet!  More information will come soon.

SWW09: A Swan, a Dolphin and 3 Matts (fluff article)

Swan and DolphinFirst the Dolphin

The Swan and Dolphin Disney resort is a beautiful place. It is actually two hotels that are kinda sorta treated as one resort. They do have separate front desks and you cannot check-in one and check-out in the other, as the SW Geek found out when we arrived (he went to the Swan when his room was in the Dolphin). The walk between the two hotels isn’t too bad.

The Dolphin appears to be larger. It has a large ground floor lobby (which is confusingly called floor 3) with a lot of lounge areas. There’s a bar off to one side that was frequented by SolidWorks World attendees on a nightly basis, and daily too.  Unfortunately, the bar area wasn’t quite large enough to accommodate all the people looking to loosen up after a busy day.

The Swan

The Swan has a good bar. From what I understand, many upstanding citizens where debauched one evening by its karaoke night on Wednesday.

3 Matts

The 3 Matts

So, I’ve added the photo to the left here.  This is for clarity so that everyone may know which Matt is which. I hope this photo clears everything up.

I’m kinda used to be the only Matt wherever I go.  Its like, I’ve got a common name that usually allows me a certain degree of uniqueness. Well, not so in the SolidWorks online community.

Just for the record, I didn’t copy anyone with my name.  I’ve had it from birth.  Really.  You can ask my parents if you don’t believe me.  I’m not so sure about the other Matts though.  They will have to give you their own references regarding the issuance of their name. (Just kidding guys)

To tell us apart, note that Matt Lombard had his bags with him the whole time.  He was hocking his books from those bags throughout the convention in a true entrepreneurial fashion.  Also note that Matt West can be identified by his jacket and glasses.  As for me, is it odd that I really don’t recognize myself in that photo?  I don’t know who that blond guy is…oh, that’s me.  Dang, pictures really do add 10 pounds.